<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Qwidget Blog - Latest Comments in Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.disqus.com/</link><description>Stories, Updates and Thoughts from the Qwidget Makers</description><atom:link href="http://qwidget.disqus.com/dvorak_on_comments/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 02:52:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-528305285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I'm not really sure which side to take right now. I'm also a blogger and readers' comments are very valuable to me. But ever since "search engine optimizers" grew larger and larger in number, irrelevant/off-topic/automated blog comments also started to spread like fire. Since then, I became more strict when it comes to moderating comments; however, I'm a very busy person so I don't always have the time to approve or decline these stuff. Qwidget might be really helpful for this kind of problem. This might be worth a try (so thanks for sharing!).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angelica</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 02:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-491950198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;filter for some words should be placed in comment tracking system&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buy targeted website traffic</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-362431915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;always keep producing fascinating blogs like this one its real worthy&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Magento web designer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-324824796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;                                Thank you for information that you provided it's very usefull.      &lt;br&gt;                                  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Skillscorp Training</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:52:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-132359146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A small vocal minority dominates the commentosphere and publishers are back to where they started. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hawaii Condominium Rentals</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:28:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-95814081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two hundred is a bit of an arbitrary cutoff number but we’ve found that it is usually enough to express a simple opinion. If Qwidget users and publishers disagree, we can always change the character limit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dogs For Sale</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-90324661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely he has found a great problem and this problem often make a blog unsuccessful. We should do some measures to prevent those and his suggestion will be very helpful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Swing Sets</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:54:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-36052689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for information that you provided it's very usefull.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:32:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-27176166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't agree with what this Patrick Nelson says. Why should comments can't have the freedom of speech and expression? As long as they don't contain obscene sites and words, they're worth being published. I wanted to explain you how &lt;a href="http://www.onlinecasinobluebook.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;online casino reviews&lt;/a&gt; work because it's something connected with the site, but if mister Patrick says that only certain words should be allowed maybe I should cut some words or the hand I'm writing with. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DeboraB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:54:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-25530918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We built the Qwidget to resolve these issues. ~ this really have to keep going, keep updates!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">miami web design</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:56:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-25517979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;patrick nelson    said the true, &lt;br&gt;definitely they should be monitored properly!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">miami web design</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:31:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-24430130</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Actually online coments are very usefull to every one . and it is also suggest to user .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Staffing</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-24415050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That Sounds interesting, I agree with you.Please keep at your good work, I would come back often.*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guilin Tour</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:48:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-24129709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nice article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Career</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:03:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-23939579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A paradox emerges: publishers encourage participation but increased levels of commenting lead to the chaos that turns off casual users.  As a result, a small vocal minority dominates the commentosphere and publishers are back to where they started.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">YourNetBiz Review</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:13:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-23873226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll try following these tips you gave. But I have been using Disqus in my blog comments, but I will give your tips a try.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TAA</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:22:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-23860786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;# Text answers to the Why? question are limited to 200 characters.  This keeps each answer short and sweet.  Two hundred is a bit of an arbitrary cutoff number but we’ve found that it is usually enough to express a simple opinion.  If Qwidget users and publishers disagree, we can always change the character limit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Register A Domain Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:40:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-23686005</link><description>&lt;p&gt; thanks for your  nice experience to share with us .Really awesome article with plenty of informative things to be known for us .Keep posting more articles like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">naperville carpet cleaning</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:37:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-23607243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;excellent post, thanks a lot for the share!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jobs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:11:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-23176430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I watch “Weeds” with my friends, I may want to ask them, “Could you ever picture yourself selling drugs?”  And they are more likely to give their thoughts on that than they are to come up with an on the spot analysis about the portrayal of drug dealers in mainstream media. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hotels in venice</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:29:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-22159838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Comments are sign of interaction with readers. Its just sad that there are those who waste time to do the other way around. But in totality, comments should be welcomed and check.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jogging double stroller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:06:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-21833648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent blog, thanks for the post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Viral Marketing</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:52:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-21833223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how can disqus solve your problem? It's just a tool that makes our life easier!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">women's shoes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:39:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-21758247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i used to spend ours with comment filtering. now disqus solves the problem&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:18:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak On Comments</title><link>http://qwidget.com/blog/2009/02/dvorak-on-comments/#comment-20922759</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I may not have “a well-reasoned alternative perspective” but I may want to say something anyway.  If I watch “Weeds” with my friends, I may want to ask them, “Could you ever picture yourself selling drugs?”&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free diapers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:52:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
